PDA

View Full Version : Will You Be Playing GPO 1000 Years from Now?



Garritan
12-03-2004, 01:54 PM
The BBC ran an interesting article by University of Cambridge geneticist Aubrey de Grey on how we may all live to be 1,000 years old.

de Grey writes: "Ageing is a physical phenomenon happening to our bodies, so at some point in the future, as medicine becomes more and more powerful, we will inevitably be able to address ageing just as effectively as we address many diseases today. I claim that we are close to that point because of the SENS (Strategies for Engineered Negligible Senescence) project to prevent and cure ageing." For the article see: http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/4003063.stm

The idea to increase life expectancy is to repair all the types of molecular and cellular damage that happen to us over time. Since these therapies repair accumulated damage the ageing process can be reversed. "When we get these therapies, we will no longer all get frail and decrepit and dependent as we get older, and eventually succumb to the innumerable ghastly progressive diseases of old age. We will still die, of course - from crossing the road carelessly, being bitten by snakes, catching a new flu variant etcetera - but not in the drawn-out way in which most of us die at present".

So will many of us forum members be making music and posting 1000 years from now? Probably according to this article.

SeanHannifin
12-03-2004, 02:07 PM
Wow, that's very interesting! My first reaction is to be skeptic, though. :) It's nice to be optimistic, but I kind of doubt this will happen. If I end up being wrong, however, I will be very happy indeed! :D Think of what a great composer I could be if I lived for that long!

Also, this might cause a debate because what if poorer people could afford the treatments to prevent ageing?

Man, how nice would this look on a gravestone? "Sean Hannifin: 1985-2985" :D

Hardy Heern
12-03-2004, 03:12 PM
One of the worlds major problems is the total over population of the planet. The human race has found very suitable living conditions and as with any animals in near ideal conditions the numbers swell to plague proportions until it then collapses due to the ecology not being able to support it.

It is believed that a number of South American and Asian civilisations rose and disappeared thousands of years before and after the bible was written due to this cycle. A lot of folk can see what's coming but there is nothing that will happen to prevent ultimate disaster because of business, politics and religion. Let's not go there. The best we can hope for is a major cull by war or disease!http://www.northernsounds.com/forum/images/smilies/smile.gif

The very last thing we need is extended life....that would be the final straw!! There are already severe demographic problems in Europe due to an ageing population.....it's a great worry to some of us....

Sorry to be a doom and gloom merchant.....but you've got to laugh haven't you? Play GPO while you can.....:eek:

Interesting article though......

Frank

LFO
12-03-2004, 04:00 PM
Tell you what Frank, I'll remember to put flowers on your grave every 100 years or so. I'd rather be able to stick around longer. :D

-Kevin

P.S. The downside to living 1,000 years is that I don't think my wife could put up with me for that long. :)

Hardy Heern
12-03-2004, 04:43 PM
Tell you what Frank, I'll remember to put flowers on your grave every 100 years or so. I'd rather be able to stick around longer. http://www.northernsounds.com/forum/images/smilies/biggrin.gif

-Kevin

P.S. The downside to living 1,000 years is that I don't think my wife could put up with me for that long. http://www.northernsounds.com/forum/images/smilies/smile.gifClever thought Kevin!!http://www.northernsounds.com/forum/images/smilies/smile.gif Did anyone mention that Women would also live a thousand years?

Cheers (as we say in Britain)

Frank

Garritan
12-03-2004, 05:09 PM
Tell you what Frank, I'll remember to put flowers on your grave every 100 years or so. I'd rather be able to stick around longer. :D

:)
We'll all honor Hardy every 100 years or so.

http://perso.wanadoo.fr/erca/hard_rock_cafe/images/guitares/paris/paris_halloween_rip_grave_guitar_2003.gif

Shazbot
12-03-2004, 05:31 PM
Eh, I don't really buy the over-population argument, especially after driving across the U.S. and seeing the vast amounts of empty space everywhere. And I think there's more than enough resources on Earth to sustain many more billions of people, especially if we harness the real possibilities of solar and nuclear energy. The problem is distribution of the space and the resources. When you've got so many thousands of people living in one city block in Japan, and so much food and energy wasted in our country, then yeah, it seems like we could never sustain that many more people.

DarwinKopp
12-03-2004, 06:00 PM
First, these age-enhancing drug therapies would really have to be a complete 180 from current practice, as most of today's drug therapies are far more long-term destructive to the body and it's immune system than are helpful. (I'm speaking specifically of current drug-regime treatment of various acute and chronic diseases, e.g., cancer, diabetes, heart disease, etc). And if nothing else, aging is simply a very slow, very chronic disease.

On the other hand, if such an anti-aging therapy were to become viable to the point of actually increasing lifespans to 1000+ years, mankind would be almost as likely to determine how to live essentially "forever" within another couple hundred years.

SeanHannifin
12-03-2004, 10:29 PM
I do know that a couple years ago there was some scientist that invented a treatment to make men immortal, but it's taking forever to test . . .

squoze
12-03-2004, 10:42 PM
I'm with Hardy on this one.
If you live to be 1000, you can't retire until you're 985.
And you'd probably have to be 210 before you could have a drink.
Bunk.

FredProgGH
12-03-2004, 11:11 PM
Ask any vampire- living too long leads to bordom and very bad hair.

SeanHannifin
12-03-2004, 11:16 PM
I'd be able to learn how to become a master at every instrument! I'd be able to finally have the following conversation:

Me: "Ever heard of Bach? Mozart? Beethoven?"
Someone: "Yes."
Me: "Morons!"

:D :D :D

SeanHannifin
12-03-2004, 11:20 PM
Seriously, though, overpopulation would be a problem. This world has too many stupid leaders, and I don't think we'd be able to manage it. Especially when people have so much time to have children. One would easily become a great great great great great great great great great grandfather (or more), not to mention have 500 children of your own. "I got married again, time for another batch!" Hmmm. . . .

Man, I'd be 1000 years old and 1/4 of the world's population could be my descendants . . . .

js33
12-04-2004, 03:59 AM
I'd be happy if they could just find cures for today's killers: Cancer, strokes, heart disease, high blood pressure, diabetes, obseity, aids, etc...But as it currently is the big drug companies don't want cures because they would lose their lifelong customers.

Cheers,
JS

SeanHannifin
12-04-2004, 04:08 AM
You bring up a very good point . . . however, at least a person who is on the trail of a cure would have a longer life in which to find it. If Einstein or da Vinci had lived for a 1,000 years, who knows what they would've come up with? If a brilliant mind has more years to live, I'm sure they'd be able to make greater breakthroughs . . .

SeanHannifin
12-04-2004, 04:25 AM
Do you know anybody that you hope doesn't live for 1,000 years, though? :D :D :D

My goodness, think about life in prison . . . :eek: