muzikworkz
07-28-2001, 02:33 AM
Ran a little test today. Downloaded demo versions of CD extract and Translator.
compared Roland extractions with Roland760.
Don\'t sell your Roland units just yet.
Neither program could beat the original sound through a roland. Even though both claim to have the original de-emphasis code.
We tested a flute sound from the roland orchestral disks. Both programs produced a low rumbling sound when played back through Gigastudio. Translator was the best of the two programs even though it took a minute to figure out it\'s interface.
The Roland unit still was unquestionably the best. Once you hear how it is supposed to sound you will never settle for less.
In addition to adding the low rumbling,
neither program got the attacks and decay exactly right. Oh well, Time to buy a rack of 5080\"s.
------------------
Visit www.muzikworkz.com (\"http://www.muzikworkz.com\")
compared Roland extractions with Roland760.
Don\'t sell your Roland units just yet.
Neither program could beat the original sound through a roland. Even though both claim to have the original de-emphasis code.
We tested a flute sound from the roland orchestral disks. Both programs produced a low rumbling sound when played back through Gigastudio. Translator was the best of the two programs even though it took a minute to figure out it\'s interface.
The Roland unit still was unquestionably the best. Once you hear how it is supposed to sound you will never settle for less.
In addition to adding the low rumbling,
neither program got the attacks and decay exactly right. Oh well, Time to buy a rack of 5080\"s.
------------------
Visit www.muzikworkz.com (\"http://www.muzikworkz.com\")