• Register
  • Help
Results 1 to 4 of 4

Topic: Rock the Vote Tells RNC to go Cheney Themselves

  1. #1

    Rock the Vote Tells RNC to go Cheney Themselves

    sponsored links

    Rock the Vote tells RNC to go Cheney themselves
    by John in DC - 10/14/2004 05:36:36 PM

    The new Rock the Vote letter to the RNC is in response to this RNC threatening letter to Rock the Vote from yesterday.

    Mr. Ed Gillespie, Chairman
    Republican National Committee
    310 First Street, SE
    Washington, DC 20003

    VIA FASCIMILE: (202) 863-8774
    Dear Chairman Gillespie,

    The letter I received from you yesterday was quite a surprise. It struck us as just the sort of “malicious political deception” that is likely to increase voter cynicism and decrease the youth vote. In fact, it is a textbook case of attempted censorship, very much in line with those that triggered our organization’s founding some fifteen years ago.

    I am stunned that you would say that the issue of the military draft as an “urban myth” that has been “thoroughly debunked by no less than the President of the United States.”

    I have some news for you. Just because President Bush, Vice President Cheney, and Secretary Rumsfeld, and for that matter Senator Kerry, say that there is not going to be a draft does not make it so. Just because Congress holds a transparently phony vote against the draft does not mean there isn’t going to be one. Anyone who thinks that the youth of America are going to take a politician’s word on this topic is living on another planet.

    By your logic, there should be no debate about anything that you disagree with. There’s a place for that kind of sentiment (and your threats), but its not here in our country.

    There are questions that the politicians are running away from. How long can we keep 138,000 U.S. troops or more on the ground in Iraq? What if full-scale civil war erupts there, as the CIA has warned is a realistic possibility? Would the next President be faced with a choice of pulling out of Iraq rather than institute a draft? Would women be drafted? What exactly would the draft-age be?

    According to the Pentagon’s own internal assessment, there are “inadequate total numbers” of troops to meet U.S. security interests. The current issue of Time magazine reports that, “General John Keane, who retired last year as the Army's No. 2 officer, says the continued success of the all-volunteer military is not guaranteed… Keane has told Congress that adding more than 50,000 troops to the Army would require thinking about a return to the draft.”

    But you want young people to believe that the draft is just an “urban myth.” I was expecting that you were going to present some facts to back up your assertion. But, instead, you have demanded that we stop talking about it.

    Although the draft may not be a discussion topic for someone of your age, we have found that young people - Republicans, Democrats and Independents - are very interested in this issue. We believe in the capacity of young Americans to make their own judgments when fairly presented with the facts. That is why we are actively promoting an informed, educated dialogue. I urge you to review the “Debunking the Myths” section on our website where we address misperceptions about the draft.

    Mr. Gillespie, this is a generational issue. Nothing cuts closer to the core of the very reason Rock the Vote exists. We think young people deserve to know where the politicians stand on this issue—and that a generation that could be called to service deserves more than the phony debate they are getting. We believe that it is only by asking questions—not by censoring debate—that our democracy can remain strong and vital.

    Issues such as jobs, health care, Iraq, taxes, and education have energized the electorate, and the draft issue deserves the same serious treatment and candor. Blanket denials do not square with the facts and do not level with the electorate.

    As far as the possibility that Rock the Vote’s efforts might “decrease the youth vote,” we are feeling very confident at this point that the opposite is true. More than 1.1 million people have used our website to fill out voter registration forms this election cycle. Our street teams and ground partners have registered hundreds of thousands more. Young voters are going to surge at the polls on Election Day and make the difference for whichever candidate does the best job reaching out to them.

    Despite the strong and often strident tone of your letter, I would hope that we could both agree that honest and open debate is the surest guarantor of our democracy and liberty.


    Jehmu S. Greene

  2. #2
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Out in left field

    Re: Rock the Vote Tells RNC to go Cheney Themselves

    Man sounds like he has his head on straight!

  3. #3

    Re: Rock the Vote Tells RNC to go Cheney Themselves

    Quote Originally Posted by Quasar
    Man sounds like he has his head on straight!
    Quasar, I see you're from a swing state. Do you find a lot of anti-bush sentiment around you? What's the pulse out there?

  4. #4
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Out in left field

    Re: Rock the Vote Tells RNC to go Cheney Themselves

    Hey Rob,

    Yeah, I do live in a swing state, and this is the first time since I've lived in Iowa that our measly 7 electoral votes have been of real interest to the candidates. Ususally they split after the caucuses, and don't look back.

    I don't know what to tell you that you wouldn't already know. First, I live in a college town, in a county that will definitely go Kerry, and is in many ways culturally isolated from the rest of the state. (A "blue" area in the so-called red/blue divide.)

    But I also have a job that serves people regionally, and meet all sorts of people from the Iowa hinterlands, from the more rustic areas of the state that I know little about. The race here is going to be awfully close.

    As far as I can tell, in the red, rural Iowa, gun control is a huge issue, and many NRA-types absolutely won't vote for a candidate that they perceive might take their guns from them. In Chicago where I was born, a pro NRA stance would be political suicide, but here it's the opposite. Kerry has been wise, in my opinion, to refrain from putting assault weapons bans at the forefront of his public agenda.

    There is also that heartland, "Gimmie that Old-Time Religion" sentiment that remains strong here. Besides the abortion issue, many folks take Bush's "born-again" fundamentalist, black hat/white hat approach as a positive, while Kerry's tendency to pontificate on the complexities of difficult issues as a negative. Even Bush's embarassing linguistic malaprops often help, rather than hurt him. "He talks regular, he don't use all them fancy 3 dollar words!"
    That sort of thing.

    Iraq is another matter entirely. Iowa, after all, is as post-Vietnam as anywhere else, and almost no one blindly accepts that the war is a good thing just because the White House tells them so. People are thoughtfully trying to think this through for themselves. And of course parents are worried about their kids getting caught up in this, too. Nobody I've talked to feels strongly enough about the war that they want to go, or have their own children go.

    Among the farmers, I think there is an almost universal perception that Washington doesn't really care about them, so there will be no farmers' voting block per se. It will come down to how they individually sort out their attiudes on the other issues.

    It's really close, bro. Flip a coin.

Go Back to forum


Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts