I think I'm the right one to mention this, because there is no way I’ll be accused of prejudice. I don't know Bruce, nor have we lined up on all that many philosophical points that I can think of yet. But right is right, and if you have been around here (this forum) long at all, or done a search on any technical questions here, you cannot help but notice that one of the most (if not the most) constantly knowledgeable, and helpful voices on this forum is Bruce Richardson, and as far as I can tell this has been true for quite some time.
So simply put, I think it would make sense for the administrators, etc. to note this, as In putting 5 stars under his name and/or some other official status or recognition.
Perhaps this whole idea will just kind of p*ss Bruce off, I don't know. It is, however, meant with good intent, and my feeling is, that it is at least, somewhat over-do.
Remember the time when we were waiting and waiting for GS3, all the complaints and bitching about the program? Bruces sane comments, assurances that we will love GS3, advises how to use it etc.etc., he deserves a galaxy of stars in my book, not that he needs them...
On a similar subject, all of you who uses this Forum, also have another name to star up, the always ready to help Jon Fairhurst. I know he does not wish to be praised either, but since we are suggesting star-addition, Jon would deserve at least the five. Big ones.