
Originally Posted by
Andrew Aversa
Peter, in the years that I have been actively following the world of VSTs and sample libraries, I have never seen so many complaints about a single VST. I simply cannot believe that they're unjustified. SO many people saying the performance is poor; that it's a resource/CPU hog, that it doesn't run on minimum or even recommend systems, that it runs poorly on even dual and quad core systems, that it causes errors with OTHER VSTs... the list doesn't end. It just astounds me.
I've actually come extremely close to purchasing a number of PLAY products on three or four occasions, and every time I'm ready to check out, I remember how many posts I've read from respectable composers who know their technology about how the software runs very poorly. Even the people that do get it to run properly admit how unoptimized it is. For something that has been out for over a year now, I think that's unacceptable.
Now, before I get attacked for any reason.. I'm a big fan of East West products in general. I've spent at least $3000 on them. I bought QLSO Gold and XP Pro for over $800, Stormdrum for $300, RA when it came out ($1000!) the Complete Composer's Bundle ($1,100) etc. I have talked to at least a hundred aspiring hobbyists who ask my advice on orchestral libraries.. I have always advised QLSO. But not anymore. Thanks to an overwhelming number of negative user reports, combined with a dongle system and less flexibility to edit patches (as opposed to Kontakt), EWQL has lost me as a customer of their new product line and I no longer recommend it. I still recommend their old releases if people can get them, though.
Bookmarks