I think I\'m going to do it. I\'m going to reformat my two Dell 4550\'s from XP to windows98 in order to get more out of SI and my performance tool for VSL.
In XP, my performance tool crashes and hangs a lot. I\'m finding that part of my problem is with MMC. However, does anyone here have an opinion if the performance tool program runs more smoothly on either/or OS?
Also, does anyone have an opinion as to the rewards vs. the work of reformating an XP machine to boot in 98? Is redoing all this crap worth it?
Win98 seems to work more efficiently at the outset, but WinXP can work longer. While its audio system is by far the better understood, Win98 doesn\'t deal very well with cleaning up after itself -- especially after manipulating large files.
So the main question seems be if the marginal increase in usable RAM is worth the extra hassle and reboots. As for my bias... I\'m a diehard Win98 user who is ready to make the switch. But then again I guess the grass is always greener etc! [img]images/icons/grin.gif[/img]
I found that Win 98 was just as stable as Win XP which started doing strange crashes before I reformatted and went back to 98. Win 98 loads so much faster. Performances load in a fraction of the time besides being able to load about 50% more.
Personally, I think and will always think it is a little nutty to run five year-old operating systems on modern hardware.
With 1.5 GB of RAM in my XP boxes, I get good loads and good performance, plus, my hardware is well supported. I don\'t know, man, I just don\'t see how it is worth it to run an OS that doesn\'t natively support half the hardware in a modern box and mobo. XP is far more stable, and its ability to recover from problems is so much greater!!
Of course, a person must do what he desires. I\'m just giving you my perspective having run both OS\'es. I would never go back to W9x. I would buy another box before I would revert to 9x for polyphony\'s sake. That\'s how strongly I personally feel about it. Your mileage may vary.
One thing to consider: I don\'t know this, but I would assume Giga 3.0 won\'t be running on W9x platforms. A developer would be nuts to spend time writing for five year-old OS software--they would get zero support from the manufacturer. As I say, I don\'t know, but I would assume it to be highly unlikely GS3 would have any support whatsoever for W9x.
I have to say I agree with that. You never want to go back to an obsolete un-supported OS. XP is the best OS MS has come up with yet. Just pack as much ram as you can on your machine and you should do ok.
It is a bit of a noodle baker, isn\'t it? Sharmy made the point that is swaying me. My Dell\'s max at 1 gig. If I get another system going in the future, I\'ll get something that can hold 3, 4 gigs of onboard ram, in which case I\'ll happily run XP.
What\'s been keeping me on the fence for several months is what Bruce was saying - These boxes are built around running XP, XP is more advanced OS, etc, etc,.
I think I have to cut the wishy washy act. I better do this before I\'m in the middle of another gig (hopefully, right?).
For whoever asked, both of my machines are P4, 2.4ghz, 1gig RAM.